How can SFL afford to give Jami away for free? How does/will SFL make money off Jami?
https://www.transifex.com/savoirfairelinux/jami/translate/#hu/$/437271800
Summary: ethical company, they will make money supporting managed Jami solutions for organizations; their main source of income is elsewhere; all Jami code is GPLv3+; etc. etc.
Should the en source string be replaced with (perhaps into multiple strings):
Fortunately, the main source of income for SFL is elsewhere.
SFL receives income supporting managed Jami solutions for organizations and enterprises with `JAMS (Jami Account Management Server) <https://jami.biz/>`.
Users are welcome to use the `Donate` button on the `Jami <https://jami.net/>` website to support Jami development.
Individuals and organizations are encouraged to contact the SFL/Jami team at contact@jami.net to pay for implementing any `Feature requests <https://docs.jami.net/developer/feature-requests.html>`.
TL;DR
-
Could the duplicate
etc. etc.
be improved? -
Is all Jami code still GPLv3+? Does jami-web code have a AGPLv3+ license? How does the license of the code relate to making money? Should the license be removed from this section? If so, should another Question and Answer be created with the code?
Jami code is released as GPLv3+ and AGPLv3+.
- Can paragraphs please be added:
(a) to state that SFL accepts donations? There is a link on the Jami webpage to: https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=MGUDJLQZ4TP5W
(b) so that people can contact SFL at contact@jami.net to pay for feature development?
(c) about managed Jami solutions be added which links to JAMS (Jami Account Management Server) at https://jami.biz/?
What do you think?
Thank you