Hi,
As I wrote to the list some time ago:
I've tried two browsers and a custom made gitlab account on git.jami.net
or my current Gitlab account, but it always end on a Forbidden page,
with a 403 reply that has the following headers:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2024 21:57:05 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.41 (Ubuntu)
X-Frame-Options: DENY
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: Mon, 01 Jan 1990 00:00:00 GMT
Content-Length: 9
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100
Connection: Keep-Alive
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I'm still stuck without Gerrit access due to the above authentication problem. It'd be nice if this could be resolved; in the meantime I've been sending patches via git send-email
to the list.
Yeah an a custom status can be sent (not supported by client yet) (but this will not change the color of the dot, because this can't be modified)
Now something similiar has been created: https://jami.net/improved-reliability-presence-and-message-status/
Fixed. Thank you
Actually I meant technically Jami sends this message before the peer gets blocked.
all supported OS and all Jami clients
I think it would be useful that if you (person A) block another peer (person B) you should have a dialog with a checkbox "Inform the peer about the block" which will send a message to the blocked person (B) that the person is now blocked.
So the blocked person gets a standard message like "You've been blocked. Note that within Jami communication is not possible anymore and the other peer won't receive any new messages, video / voice messages and/or attachments/files and you won't be able to call the peer unless you get unblocked."
You should have also the possibility to to generally disable or enable such a notification in the settings per own Jami account. So you won't get a dialog with a checkbox and no other peer will ever receive any notification that he has been blocked. He might just knows it because nothing works anymore.
And it should be possible using Jami account 1 for example contact A gets a notification but contact B and C won't get any notification (opt-in per contact unless you generally disable this notifications in the settings (per Jami accounts)).
Blocking someone will literally block any further communication possible. This will not change
all supported OS and all Jami clients
I think it would be useful that if you (person A) block another peer (person B) you should have a dialog with a checkbox "Inform the peer about the block" which will send a message to the blocked person (B) that the person is now blocked.
So the blocked person gets a standard message like "You've been blocked. Note that within Jami communication is not possible anymore and the other peer won't receive any new messages, video / voice messages and/or attachments/files and you won't be able to call the peer unless you get unblocked."
You should have also the possibility to to generally disable or enable such a notification in the settings per own Jami account. So you won't get a dialog with a checkbox and no other peer will ever receive any notification that he has been blocked. He might just knows it because nothing works anymore.
And it should be possible using Jami account 1 for example contact A gets a notification but contact B and C won't get any notification (opt-in per contact unless you generally disable this notifications in the settings (per Jami accounts)).
Please show the translated article title in the web browser window title
https://jami.net/improved-reliability-presence-and-message-status/?lang=hu
Thank you
Cc: @plarose
Please enable Newsletter Privacy Policy
to be translatable
https://jami.net/newsletter-privacy-policy/?lang=hu
Thank you
Cc: @plarose
@plarose should Subscribe to the Jami newsletter
be added to https://jami.net/contribute/ under the section Join the Jami community
?
What do you think?
Thank you
Join the Jami community
headingMailling
typo? Should it be Mailing
, i.e. only 1 "l"?What do you think?
Thank you
Cc: @plarose
@plarose should a link to the MUO: Make Use Of_
article below be added to https://jami.net/ under the section Mentioned In
?
MUO: Make Use Of_
article by Danny Maiorca and Hilda Munjuri Updated Mar 8, 2024
https://www.makeuseof.com/open-source-video-conferencing-software/
What do you think?
Thank you
Ordre du jour:
Ideally the watcher on your system should do this I guess.
For 1:1 the person is your contact, for group chat, it may be something. But for now, group are not public, so it's less problematic.
I guess this can be done through a plugin, but the team will probably never do this.
I'm not in favor of sending data to any third service party.
I agree - but I thought it might be an option if a unknown peer tries to send you a file?
I'm not in favor of sending data to any third service party. Normally the OS can check file itself