Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in / Register
jami-project
jami-project
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 178
    • Issues 178
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
  • Requirements
    • Requirements
    • List
  • Security & Compliance
    • Security & Compliance
    • Dependency List
    • License Compliance
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • savoirfairelinux
  • jami-projectjami-project
  • Issues
  • #45

Closed (moved)
Open
Opened Nov 03, 2015 by RingBot@RingBotOwner

Fix unattended transfer

Issue generated from Tuleap's migration script. Originally submitted by: Alexandre Lision (alision)

When making an unattended transfer, the peer that got transfered does not see the new call, although it's properly handled in the daemon.

After some investigation I found out that when the peer receive a transfer request (refer_to field in invite), the daemon creates a new outgoing call, and hang up the previous one (as explained here: http://www.in2eps.com/fo-sip/tk-fo-sip-service-04.html).

Problem is, daemon doesn't warns that it is doing that, therefore clients can't handle this new outgoing call.

The next thing emitted by the daemon about that call is a state changed to CONNECTING. But LRC has no knowledge of this call, and rejects it.

We need to agree on what daemon should emit:

  • a simple call state change, and LRC will handle the unknown call. But in this case, we should remove the incomingCall signal and replace it by a call state change as well.

  • create a new signal just as incomingCall (or reuse the NewCallCreated signal)

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: savoirfairelinux/ring-project#45